Potential dangers of working in the field

A couple of recent articles have pointed to potential dangers of sexual harassment or assault during scientific field work. I can't say that I'm surprised at the numbers. When you're working in a strange environment, a foreign country, in close quarters, adverse conditions, etc., the possibility of harassment or assault is increased. I am linking to the articles here to share with you. You have to be smart to protect yourself when you're in the field in many different ways.

Here is the New York Times opinion piece by Hope Jahren (University of Hawaii) about her experience in the field, including a warning to women in the field sciences, and hope that men will learn about this problem too.

This is the PLoS One article by Clancy et al. (2014) that is referenced in the NY Times article.

January 2019 update: The stories of harassment of women in the field continue. Read this compelling story of a Boston University professor and his graduate student in the field in Antarctica in Science.

(Lack of) Recognition for women in science

In looking for information about the 2013 American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco that my students and I attend each year, I ran across this photo of the 2012 Honors Ceremony to recognize scientists that have made significant contributions to the earth sciences:

I count about 23 medals hanging around necks in the first two rows of seats, and there is exactly one woman. (Did the photographer put her in the front row to make sure we see her?) I think this is appalling.

The reasons for such a small percentage of women being recognized for their contributions to earth science probably reflect in part why the numbers of women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines steadily decreases from the students graduate from university through the rank of full professor and beyond:

I don't want to re-hash the various arguments about why women don't stay in STEM fields in academia - they range from "old boys club" sexism in hiring and a hostile work environment to wanting to have kids while trying to earn tenure to wanting higher salaries for less work required outside academia to a lack of support from their spouses at home to dual career couples who can't make it work - but rather to point out that whatever the reason(s), women remain underrepresented in STEM fields and that needs to be corrected.

The GRE (with a 2020 update)

GRE scores are required with most applications to graduate school. You must (MUST!) study for the GRE because you can improve your quantitative score dramatically even if your math skills are good (even very good), and the quantitative scores are what science faculty look at first. And despite the GRE's shortcomings, the majority of faculty looking at graduate applications give the scores A LOT of weight. The verbal scores are frankly less important (to me and some other faculty, even at large research universities) because it better reflects an applicant's economic background (and, of course, whether an applicant is a native English speaker), and tells us nothing about your ability to write. If I want to know if an applicant can write (and if they're savvy), I look to their e-mails to me and to their statement of purpose.

October 2020 update: There is no statistical correlation between GRE scores and success in graduate school. According to this article in The Atlantic, student performance on the GRE correlates more closely to a combination of factors that includes access to expensive test prep courses and other educational opportunities that prepare students for the test, and even the "student’s own insecurities regarding race and gender." A UCSF study showed that success in graduate school is better predicted by letters of recommendation from faculty advisors who know the student well, and the amount of research experience the applicant already has under their belt.

The Earth & Climate Sciences Department at SF State has joined the growing ranks of geology/Earth science departments that have ended the practice of requiring GRE scores be submitted with grad school applications. Many universities have ended this requirement; some make reporting your GRE scores optional which makes the choice of whether or not to report your scores a new kind of problem (I advise against it unless your scores are top tier). It is not yet universal, but the number of programs adopting this new policy is growing particularly following the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. Of course, letters of recommendation aren't a perfect means of evaluation. A 2016 study in Nature Geoscience showed that women are "significantly less likely to receive excellent recommendation letters than their male counterparts" and the length of letters written for women are much shorter.

There is no easy fix here. Faculty in the Earth & Climate Sciences Department at SF State have started to use evaluation rubrics for hiring new faculty to avoid implicit bias. I think it's time to start using a similar rubric to evaluate graduate program applicants... and without a column for GRE scores!